Counterterrorism Blog
The first multi-expert blog dedicated solely to counterterrorism issues, serving as a gateway to the community for policymakers and serious researchers. Designed to provide realtime information about terrorism cases and policy developments.
 

Is al Qaeda playing politics in Europe again?

By Lorenzo Vidino

As the latest messages from Osama bin Laden and Ayman al Zawahiri have once again confirmed, al Qaeda is a careful observer of Western political affairs, often crafting its words and actions in order to have an impact on political decisions made by Western leaders. One of al Qaeda’s main short-term goals, as formulated by many of the group’s strategists, has been to force countries that have contributed to U.S. efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan to withdraw their troops. As a consequence, in al Qaeda’s plans, the U.S. will find the financial, military, and political burden of conducting the two campaigns too burdensome.

The strategy has been outlined, among other places, in “Jihadi Iraq, Hopes and Dangers,” a sophisticated political analysis of the war in Iraq that was circulating on the Internet around the fall of 2003. The document has been considered the ideological inspiration for the March 2004 Madrid train bombings, as it indicated Spain as the weak link of the chain among the European countries that had troops in Iraq. “We think that the Spanish government could not tolerate more than two, maximum three blows, after which it will have to withdraw as a result of popular pressure,” said the document. It was wrong: one blow strategically executed a few days before the elections made Spaniards oust the pro-war Aznar government. The newly elected Socialist government, as promised during the campaign, immediately withdrew Spanish troops from Iraq, signaling al Qaeda’s first success in manipulating the political life of a European democracy.

It appears that al Qaeda is playing politics in Europe once again, this time targeting Italy. Last April Italian voters ousted Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, a staunch supporter of U.S. efforts in the war on terror who sent a contingent of 1,600 troops to Afghanistan and 2,700 to Iraq. Italians voted to replace Berlusconi with Romano Prodi, who heads a coalition government whose main components have repeatedly called for the withdrawal of all Italian troops. Since Prodi’s election Italian troops have been hit with repeated attacks in both Iraq (3 soldiers killed on April 27) and Afghanistan (2 killed today). The attacks came as surprises, since Italian troops are involved mostly in peace-keeping missions and have been attacked only sporadically in the three years they have been operating on the ground in the two countries. Hence the suspicion, revealed by Italian military intelligence, that the attacks in Iraq and Afghanistan have been coordinated in order to put “pressure on the new Italian government to withdraw its military contingents.” Knowing that the new government is already inclined to withdraw troops, but has not taken the decisive step in order not to open its mandate with a faux pas with Washington, al Qaeda might be trying to put additional pressure and to, once again, influence the democratic process of a European country. We’ll see in the next weeks if they have scored another victory.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://counterterrorismblog.org/mt/pings.cgi/2701

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Is al Qaeda playing politics in Europe again?:

» Is al Qaeda playing politics in Europe again? from NoisyRoom.net
Courtesy of the Counterterrorism Blog: By Lorenzo Vidino As the latest messages from Osama bin Laden and Ayman al Zawahiri have once again confirmed, al Qaeda is a careful observer of Western political affairs, often crafting its words and actions i... [Read More]

» Is al Qaeda playing politics in Europe again? By Lorenzo Vidino from The Absurd Report
When it comes to public relations you have to admit, “These Guys Are Good.” ... [Read More]

» Is Italy the New Spain? from The Cranky Insomniac
Regardless of one's original views regarding the justification for, or necessity of, the War in Iraq, it is now the height of foolishness to not understand beyond any doubt that (along with Afghanistan) al Qaeda considers it the frontline of the GWOT... [Read More]

» Monday's Winds of War: 8 May 2006 from Winds of Change.NET
Welcome! Our goal at Winds of Change.NET is to give you one power-packed briefing of insights, news and trends from the global War on Terror that leaves you stimulated, informed, and occasionally amused every Monday... [Read More]

» Monday's Winds of War: 8 May 2006 from Security Watchtower
Welcome! Our goal at Winds of Change.NET is to give you one power-packed briefing of insights, news and trends from the global War on Terror that leaves you stimulated, informed, and occasionally amused every Monday & Thursday. Monday's Winds of War br... [Read More]

» Quick Hits from Chris At Home

  • Jeff Goldstein is pissed off (but hilarious) in his post regarding the NY Times defense of Zarqawi's weapons skills.
  • [U...
[Read More]

» Ending Elections in Iraq via Elections in Italy, UK, US? from StrategyUnit - global security issues - terrorism, energy, defense...
The Elections in the UK, Italy and soon in the US UK: Last week’s regional elections has escalated a civil war in Blair’s Labour Party, with dissenters demanding him to step down. Telegraph reports: “Tony Blair abandoned his election... [Read More]