![]() |
| The first multi-expert blog dedicated solely to counterterrorism issues, serving as a gateway to the community for policymakers and serious researchers. Designed to provide realtime information about terrorism cases and policy developments. |
Iran To Seek 2009 Security Council Seat While Ignoring UN SanctionsBy Victor Comras
Word is circulating though the halls of UN headquarters in New York that Iran will actively campaign for a non permanent seat on the Security Council for 2009 or 2010. Perhaps such an Iran candidacy should come as no surprise given Libya’s current Security Council’s tenancy, and the long list of other rogue states that have occupied seats on the Security Council in the past. Yet, this latest move by Iran must really be taken as a “stick-it in your eye” gesture toward the Security Council and the United Nations itself, given Iran’s current outrageous international behavior and its refusal to abide by numerous Security Council resolutions demanding that it suspend its uranium enrichment program. One can only imagine the absurd imagery and consequences of Iran sitting as a full member of the Security Council and its Sanctions Committee charged with overseeing the implementation of the very sanctions measures against her. If only this candidacy presaged a change of course - a willingness to come into compliance with UN Security Council demands and to truly demonstrate that Iran intends to abide by international non proliferation norms. Lost somewhere in time is the notion of what was originally envisaged by the founder’s of the United Nations as the criteria that should be used in selecting Non Permanent Security Council Members. The Charter of the United Nations provides in Article 23: “The General Assembly shall elect ten other Members of the United Nations to be non-permanent members of the Security Council, due regard being specially paid, in the first instance to the contribution of Members of the United Nations to the maintenance of international peace and security and to the other purposes of the Organization, and also to equitable geographical distribution.”: As Congresswoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL), aptly pointed out today:
"Intimidation and coercion are hallmarks of the Iranian regime’s international approach, as are deception and obfuscation, as evidenced by this rogue state’s continued defiance of UN Security Council mandates concerning its nuclear program."
TrackBackTrackBack URL for this entry: |