How to Export an Awakening
By Daveed Gartenstein-Ross
The U.S. needs a new military strategy in Afghanistan, and has made clear -- through General David Petraeus, the new head of CENTCOM -- that it intends to try to replicate the success of Iraq's Awakening movement in Afghanistan. Iraq's Awakening was an alliance of Sunni
tribesmen, Iraqi nationalists, ex-Baathists, and others who were united by the
goal of driving al-Qaeda from their country. In considering how the U.S. will try to foster such a movement in Afghanistan, there is no better place to start
than a 47-page memorandum written by Sheikh Ahmad Abu Risha, the leader
of Iraq's Awakening, that was submitted to the American embassy in
Kabul last spring.
In an article published in the new issue of the Weekly Standard, my colleague Joshua Goodman and I analyze Abu Risha's memo, and the prospect of an Afghan Awakening. An excerpt:
Abu Risha reviews several challenges in Afghanistan. The country is
beset by warlords and their followers, who "are accustomed to living
freely without the rule of law." There is great distrust of Hamid
Karzai's government, which some Afghans believe is conspiring with the
United States in "Americanizing and changing the identity of the Afghan
people." This distrust is magnified by the country's living conditions:
The economy is poor, with wages low and unemployment high. Despite
improvements, the government has been unable to provide adequate
education and health care.
These internal factors are compounded, in Abu Risha's view, by a
military picture unfavorable to the United States. He argues that
"military attacks by air against Taliban locations will cause the loss
of many civilian lives," and so are likely to generate hostility to
U.S. and NATO forces.
Abu Risha argues, nevertheless, that there are parallels between
Afghanistan today and Iraq's Anbar Province in 2006 and 2007. Most
important, al Qaeda and affiliated groups in Afghanistan have created a
"climate of terror" similar to what they created in Anbar, where "they
murdered anyone who opposed or criticized their actions and behavior."
As in Anbar, he believes, an Awakening could help Afghanistan reverse
its present deadly course.
Abu Risha outlines some preconditions for success. First and
foremost is the need for a strong leader. In Anbar, this was the late
Abdul Sattar al-Rishawi, Abu Risha's brother, assassinated in late
2007. Such a figure must have "charisma, outstanding leadership
elements and courage," he should be "a man of honor, tolerant and
persistent," and he should be "a center of trust" with "a political
family background." Abu Risha emphasizes, however, that NATO should not
try to establish new leadership in Afghanistan, but should work within
the tribes' existing hierarchies. "This is a nation," he writes, "that
does not accept changes or give up control easily without a fight."
Sterling Jensen, who participated as an Army contract linguist in the
U.S. government's engagement with the Iraqi tribes as the Anbar
Awakening was taking shape in the fall of 2006, agrees that Abdul
Sattar's leadership was critical. "The Americans didn't make the
Awakening," Jensen says. "They didn't make Sheikh Ahmed or Sheikh Abdul
Sattar. You can influence some [local leaders'] thinking, but it's
going to be the Americans recognizing these kinds of leaders, and
supporting them."
You can read the full article
here.