Will Afghanistan Awake?
By Daveed Gartenstein-Ross
Earlier this year, I wrote a couple of pieces about the prospects of an Afghan "Awakening" with my colleague Joshua Goodman (detailing Iraqi Awakening leader Sheikh Ahmad Abu Risha's suggestions for an Afghan Awakening, and responding to the early criticisms of Canadian defense minister Peter MacKay). Yesterday I had an op-ed in the Washington Times that analyzes four of the major criticisms of the prospects of an Afghan Awakening. An excerpt:
U.S. Central Command recently announced it will be supporting an
indigenous movement opposing al Qaeda and the Taliban in Afghanistan,
similar to the Awakening movement that was central to turning Iraq
around. Already, critics are saying it won't work.
Iraq's Anbar Awakening was a collection of Sunni tribesmen, Iraqi
nationalists, former insurgents and others united by the goal of
driving al Qaeda from their country. Coalition forces gave this
movement protection and support at key points, and it was later
broadened through the Sons of Iraq, a U.S. initiative authorizing
formation of paramilitary organizations.
There are good reasons to think the case for pessimism in
Afghanistan is wrong. Four arguments are commonly made suggesting an
Afghan Awakening could not succeed: that it would detract from
improvements in Afghan security forces, that Afghanistan is too
different from Iraq, that the Pashtun tribes would not support an
Awakening, and that these efforts could destabilize Afghanistan.
Canadian Defense Minister Peter MacKay, for example, opposes an
Afghan Awakening because he prefers a more formal training process that
leads to a more reliable, more professional soldier and Afghan national
security force. One problem with this view is that Afghan forces have
been slow to develop. Newsweek recently reported that U.S. commanders
think Afghan units may not be able to operate independently for another
five years.
Moreover, there is no forced choice between an Awakening and the
development of Afghan forces. Both can be done at once.
You can read the entire op-ed here.