The Attack on Syria's al-Kibar Nuclear Facility
By Daveed Gartenstein-Ross
The new issue of inFocus is devoted to discussion of Syria, and the possibility of engagement with the country. My colleague Josh Goodman and I contributed an article about Israel's attack on Syria's al-Kibar reactor in September 2007. An excerpt:
Syria's response in the wake of Israel's bombing was curious. The
regime sought no retaliatory measures. It did not even ask the U.N.
Security Council to discuss or condemn the incident. Rather, satellite
photos show Syria's efforts to scrub the site of any traces of the
nuclear reactor that Syria denied having. Reuters reported that Syria
bulldozed the area, "removed debris and erected a new building in a
possible cover-up." Former U.N. weapons inspector David Albright,
president of the prestigious Institute for Science and International
Security (ISIS), told the New York Times, "It looks like Syria
is trying to hide something and destroy the evidence of some activity.
But it won't work. Syria has got to answer questions about what it was
doing."
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) director Mohammed
ElBaradei condemned the U.S. and Israel for their "shoot first and ask
questions later" approach. Nonetheless, the IAEA began probing Syrian
nuclear activity, and Syria gave its inspectors access to the al-Kibar
site in June 2008. (Syria later refused IAEA requests to revisit
al-Kibar and examine three other related sites.)
The IAEA released a report on November 19, 2008, containing a number
of relevant data points. The report establishes that construction of
the al-Kibar facility began between April 26 and August 4, 2001. Based
on analysis of satellite imagery, the IAEA also notes:
Imagery taken prior to and immediately after the bombing
indicates that the destroyed box-shaped building may have had
underground levels. Its containment structure appears to have been
similar in dimension and layout to that required for a biological
shield for nuclear reactors, and the overall size of the building was
sufficient to house the equipment needed for a nuclear reactor of the
type alleged.
To read the whole article, click here.