Pakistan's Fifth Column
By Daveed Gartenstein-Ross
I published an op-ed in Canada's National Post yesterday examining the problem of religious militancy in Pakistan's military and intelligence services. An excerpt:
Pakistan has engaged in a two-month offensive against Islamic
militants in the country's Swat region, a campaign that began when the
Taliban captured a district just 60 miles from Islamabad, the nation's
capital. As the campaign winds down, and local residents begin to
return, significant questions remain about future counterinsurgency
operations. For example, while Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari has
asked Washington for his own armed Predator drones for use against the
Taliban, regional newspaper Dawn reports that U. S. intelligence
officers oppose this move -- in part because several years ago
"American officials gave Pakistan advance word of planned Predator
attacks, but stopped the practice after the information was leaked to
militants."
This relatively minor disagreement highlights
an issue that cuts to the heart of many of the challenges Pakistan
faces: support for religious militancy within the country's military
and Inter-Services Intelligence agency (ISI).
At its
founding, Pakistan's military was shaped by the country's colonial
experience. Scholar Shuja Nawaz, whose instalment in this op-ed series
appeared earlier this week, notes that Pakistan's army began with an
elitist orientation, filled at the upper echelons with British officers
who "were in turn succeeded by their native clones, men who saw the
army as a unique institution, separate and apart from the rest of civil
society and authority."
In the 1970s, two major changes had
a lasting impact. First, prime minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto broadened
the ISI by creating an internal wing. He wanted to bolster his own
power, and had the ISI spy on friend and foe alike. Ironically, the
wing Bhutto created would play a role in the coup that toppled him in
1977.
The second change was brought by the man who came to
power in that coup, General Muhammad Zia ul-Haq. Zia's religious zeal
translated into overtly Muslim public policy positions and imposition
of Islamic norms. Zia devoted particular attention to the military,
where officers were required to read S. K. Malik's The Quranic Concept
of War, and a Directorate of Religious Instruction oversaw their
Islamic education. Religious criteria were incorporated into promotion
requirements, and Zia mandated formal obedience to Islamic rules within
the military.
Click here for the full piece. For more on this subject, see an extended article that I wrote earlier this year for the Journal of International Security Affairs.